ASIC's Deep Dive into Private Lending Reveals Industry Shortcomings
The Need for Enhanced Transparency and Regulation
0
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has conducted a comprehensive review of the private lending sector, uncovering several areas of concern.
The investigation revealed inconsistent and unclear reporting, downplayed risks, opaque fee structures, conflicts of interest, and poor valuation practices within the industry.
Private lending, also known as private credit, has experienced rapid growth, with approximately $200 billion in loans extended, much of it to higher-risk real estate players and property developers. This expansion has been fueled by investors seeking higher yields and borrowers looking for alternatives to traditional bank loans.
ASIC's findings highlight the need for improved standards and transparency in the private lending sector. The regulator is considering tighter regulations to align private lending practices with those of the banking sector, aiming to protect investors and maintain financial stability.
For borrowers, this scrutiny may lead to more transparent loan terms and better protection against predatory lending practices. Investors should be aware of the potential risks associated with private lending and conduct thorough due diligence before committing funds.
In conclusion, ASIC's investigation into private lending underscores the importance of regulatory oversight in rapidly growing financial sectors. Both borrowers and investors should stay informed about potential changes and exercise caution when engaging with private lenders.
Published:Wednesday, 24th Dec 2025 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
In a significant move to support first-home buyers, the Queensland Government has introduced the Boost to Buy scheme, a shared equity initiative designed to make home ownership more attainable. This program offers an equity contribution of up to 30% for new homes and 25% for existing homes, applicable to properties valued up to $1 million. Eligible households with incomes up to $225,000 can benefit from this scheme, which aims to reduce the deposit gap that often hinders first-time buyers. - read more
The recent expansion of the First Home Guarantee Scheme has led to a notable increase in borrowing among first-home buyers. Data from Loan Market Group indicates that, following the scheme's October expansion, first-time buyers in New South Wales borrowed an average of $750,250 in October, up from $630,200 in the previous quarter-a 19% increase. Similar trends were observed in South Australia, with average loans rising by $105,000. - read more
Victoria's existing stamp duty concession cap has become a significant hurdle for first-home buyers. The current scheme offers full stamp duty exemptions for properties up to $600,000 and concessions for those up to $750,000. However, with rising property prices, many first-time buyers find themselves exceeding these thresholds, resulting in substantial tax liabilities. For instance, purchasing a property valued at $750,001 incurs a stamp duty of $40,070, escalating to $55,000 for a $1 million property. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced a significant policy change aimed at mitigating risks in the housing market. Effective February 2026, APRA will implement a cap on high debt-to-income (DTI) home loans, limiting banks to issuing no more than 20% of new home loans with DTI ratios of six times or higher. This measure applies to both owner-occupier and investor loans, excluding new housing developments. - read more
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has conducted a comprehensive review of the private lending sector, uncovering several areas of concern. The investigation revealed inconsistent and unclear reporting, downplayed risks, opaque fee structures, conflicts of interest, and poor valuation practices within the industry. - read more